Oil Prices Get Tiny Reprieve As API Reports Modest Crude Draw. The leading economics blog online covering financial issues, geopolitics and trading.

'PLUGGING IN' THE CONSUMER: THE ADOPTION OF ELECTRICALLY POWERED VEHICLES IN THE US | The Case Centre, for educators

An electric automobile will convert percent of the energy in natural gas into motion. A normal vehicle will convert percent of the energy in gasoline into motion. That's 3 or 4 times more energy recovered with an internal combustion vehicle than an electric vehicle.

Electricity is a specialty product. It's not appropriate for transportation. It looks cheap at this time, but that's because it was designed for toasters, not transportation.

Increase the amount of wiring and infrastructure by a factor of a thousand, and it's expensive. Electricity does not scale up properly to the transportation industry due to its miniscule nature. Sure, a whole lot can be used for something, but at extraordinary expense. Using electricity as an energy source requires two energy transformation steps, while using petroleum requires only one.

With electricity, the original energy, usually chemical energy, must be transformed into electrical energy; and then the electrical energy is transformed into the kinetic energy of motion. With an internal combustion engine, the only transformation step is the conversion of chemical energy to kinetic energy in the combustion chamber.

The difference matters, because there is a lot of energy lost every time it is transformed or used. Electrical energy is harder to handle and loses more in its handling. The use of electrical energy requires it to move into and out of the space medium aether through induction.

Induction through the aether medium should be referred to as another form of energy, but physicists sandwich it into the category of electrical energy. Going into and out of the aether through induction loses a lot of energy.

Oil Prices Fall As Hedge Funds Throw In The Towel. Another problem with electricity is that it loses energy to heat production due to resistance in the wires. A short transmission line will have 20 percent loss built in, and a long line will have 50 percent loss built in. These losses are integrated because reducing the loss by half would require twice as much metal in the wires.

Wires have to be optimized for diameter and strength, which means doubling the metal would be doubling the number of transmission lines. High voltage transformers can achieve 90 percent efficiency with expensive designs, but household level voltages achieve only 50 percent efficiency.

Electric motors can get up to 60 percent efficiency, but only at optimum rpms and load. For autos, they average 25 percent efficiency. Gasoline engines get 25 percent efficiency with old-style carburetors and 30 percent with fuel injection, though additional loses can occur. Applying this brilliant engineering to the problem yields this result: A natural gas electric generating turbine gets 40 percent efficiency. A high voltage transformer gets 90 percent efficiency.

A household level transformer gets 50 percent efficiency. A short transmission line gets 20 percent loss, which is 80 percent efficiency. Some say the electricity performs a little better in the vehicle, but it's not much. Electricity appears to be easy to handle sending it through wires.

But it is the small scale that makes it look cheap. Scaling it up takes a pound of metal for so many electron-miles.

Twice as much distance means twice as much metal. Twice as many amps means twice as much metal. Converting the transportation system into an electrical based system would require scaling up the amount of metal and electrical infrastructure by factors of hundreds or thousands. Where are all those lines going to go? Where is that much natural gas going to come from for the electrical generators?

There is very little natural gas in existence when using it for a large-scale purpose. Natural gas must be used with solar and wind energy, because only it can be turned on and off easily for backup. Do Saudi Arabia And Russia Really Want Higher Oil Prices? One of the overwhelming facts about electric transportation is the chicken and egg phenomenon. Supposedly, a lot of electric vehicles will create an incentive to create a lot of expensive infrastructure.

There are a lot of reasons why none of the goals can be met for such an infrastructure. The basic problem is that electricity will never be appropriate for such demanding use as general transportation, which means there will never be enough chickens or eggs to balance the demand. It's like trying to improve a backpack to such an extent that it will replace a pickup truck. The limitations of muscle metabolism are like the limitations of electrical energy.

Electrons are not a space-saving form of energy. Electrons have to be surrounded by large amounts of metal. It means electric motors get heavy and large. When cruising around town, the problems are not so noticeable.

But the challenges of ruggedness are met far easier with internal combustion engines. Engineers say it is nice to get rid of the drive train with electric vehicles. But in doing so, they add clutter elsewhere, which adds weight, takes up space and messes up the suspension system. Out on the highway, the suspension system is the most critical factor. These problems will prevent electric vehicles from replacing petroleum vehicles for all but specialty purposes.

The infrastructure needed for electric vehicles will never exist when limited to specialty purposes. This would be true even with the perfect battery which takes up no space and holds infinite charge. This Supreme Court Ruling Raises Global Risks For Resource Firms. French Oil Giant Total Earning Like It's Can Oil Come Back From Its Longest Losing Streak In Years? Getting Left Behind In The Renewable Race? The materials provided on this Web site are for informational and educational purposes only and are not intended to provide tax, legal, or investment advice.

Nothing contained on the Web site shall be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell a security to any person in any jurisdiction. Home Oil Prices Energy Energy-General Oil Prices Crude Oil Heating Oil Gas Prices Natural Gas Coal Company News Interviews. Nuclear Power Solar Energy Hydroelectric Renewable Energy Geothermal Energy Wind Power Fuel Cells Tidal Energy Biofuels Environment Global Warming Oil Spills.

Oil Prices Get Tiny Reprieve As API Reports Modest Crude Draw Find us on: Utility Industry Breaking Free From Its Death Spiral? After a decade of stagnant….

Could Russian Hackers Cause Power Outages In The U. Hackers allegedly allied with the…. ZeroHedge The leading economics blog online covering financial issues, geopolitics and trading.

The Inconvenient Truth About Electric Vehicles By ZeroHedge - May 03,2: Oil Prices Fall As Hedge Funds Throw In The Towel Another problem with electricity is that it loses energy to heat production due to resistance in the wires. All Eyes On Saudi Arabia As OPEC Begins To Unravel Are Gasoline Prices About To Crash?

Glut Moves Downstream What Crack Spreads Say About Oil Prices. Previous Post This Supreme Court Ruling Raises Global Risks For Resource Firms.

Next Post French Oil Giant Total Earning Like It's Related posts The Most Lucrative Real Estate On The Planet Why Is Saudi Arabia Desperate For Higher Oil Prices? Have Natural Gas Prices Hit A Bottom? What a blatant propaganda article, trains locomotive can develop as much as hp from electricity but sure electricity is hard to scale. Almost half of the article is devoted to how there are losses while transmitting electricity but what about the energy cost of drilling and transporting not to mention liquefy or compress the natural gas or process crude for gasoline.

"Plugging In" the Consumer: The Adoption of Electrically Powered Vehicles in the U.S. - Case - Harvard Business School

It is people like these who stop us from moving forward with their blatant lies, misinformed opinion and 'alternative facts'. I am surprised something like oilprice. Let's build towards a future of alternative energy and not alternative facts.

Tormod on May 03 said:. Wow, that was a lot of questionable statements to be gentle. But of course, if you say electricity comes from gas, and cars run on liquid gas, you are shifting the reality towards combustion advantages.

In Norway they built a liquid gas power station at Mongstadbut they never used it because the demand decreased as the world come more electrically efficient, and the renewable electric production from waterfalls and such increased, and a car's electric consumtion is only about 0.

And solar systems sales are increasing heavily even in cloudy Norway, as it becomes cheaper every day. So waterfalls create electricity, more than TyFawkes on May 03 said:. You've failed to include all the electricity necessary to make the fuel for equipment used for oil drilling, and extraction.

Not to mention the energy necessary for fuel transport? That's what the whale oil lamp sellers claimed all the way into bankruptcy. Name a industry, any industry, that can function without electricity. The USA has the largest natural gas reserves in the world. Wind and solar prices are falling.

Small scale, eco friendly hydro is making a comeback. The there is new nuclear and even coal technology. Electricity will be cheap and plentiful for many generations to come. Or, we can continue buying oil from rag heads who hate U. Bill Gates on May 03 said:. Ramon Galvez on May 03 said:. What a load of crap wow! This is so blatantly biased and false that it's hard to believe it was republished. The sad thing about this is that they are so obviously wrong and demonstrably.

We truly are living in a post fact world. Rgb on May 03 said:. The math in this article is out to lunch when it comes to line lose theory and overall transmission losses of the electrical grid.

Not to mention using wind, solar, hydro and nuclear to generate electricity do not rely heavily on the oil industry once operational. Marc on May 03 said:. There's nothing wrong with right of left leaning point of vues This website should be about oil The title "Inconvenient Truth" itself suggests a political hack job. Zerohedge is either a political hack, or an industrial one. Until Zerohedge can compare apples to apples, oilprice. Exa on May 03 said:. We do not have to rely on imprecise statements like "electricity is lossy" or "we'd need more infrastructure" to determine how hard it is to use electricity for transportation which trains and subways have been doing for the better part of a century, by the waywe can look at how much these things, which we are in fact doing, are in fact costing.

And how those costs are changing over time. And the actual numbers paint a very different picture than this balderdash. J P DeCaen on May 03 said:. The inconvenient truth is that this article is full of it. Drive a Tesla and you will understand. Marcus on May 03 said:. This post is complete garbage, one more of these kind of crap from ZH then I'm gonna come back anymore. The author is a nut. If all the electrical machinery had stated efficiencies they would melt. The number of transformations of energy are irrelevant.

What counts is the overall efficiency. With so many errors and there are many morethis article isn't worth reading. Annon on May 04 said:. That was a poorly researched article. If what the author said was true, we'd all be running our houses from gas powered generators.

Durk on May 04 said:. This article is full of alternative facts. Can you explain which physical law there is to support your fake news? It's true that you need thicker wires and higher voltages to transport bigger amounts of energy.

You also need a bigger engine if you want more horsepower. I hope noone accepts these falsehoods. Tomas Gajdos on May 04 said:. Am still surprised somebody can write such a biased article.

How much energy does it take to refine a galon of gas? Electric car can already run on that energy not being lost in the process. Last but not least, energy mix gets cleaner everyday, countries ditching old coal daily trading volume in the foreign exchange market was about ________ per ________ in 2007 gas plants in exchange for new cleaner energy sources.

If i were you, would serioslu consider spreasing your investment beyond oil, as the latest low oil prices could return sooner than later JOhn Scior on May 04 said:.

It sounds much like arguments about ethanol. What if more widescale adoption of solar allows shorter transmission between production and the EV. Aren't you utilizing a transmission system already in place thus negating the argument concerning environmental destruction caused by transmission lines. Oil is a diminishing resource but with Solar, wind and hydroelectric or for that matter geothermal, you have renewable resources of which little goes to fund petrodollar fueled wars or terrorism?

Science is also pushing for more efficient transmission lines average salary of new york stockbroker more efficient GEn 4 nuclear reactors ie fast breeders that could also diminish the arguments favoring oil based fuels.

Then there is the prospect of Nuclear fusion reactors either the large scale traditional ones such as Germany's or the small scale Bussard inspired LM designs that offer the potential of displacing all carbon fuel based electricity generation. The article is good in the sense that for developing nations without a substantial grid, the transmission lines and electrical generation costs would have to be accounted for as well because few articles mention these attributes as this article points out.

The question remains for the future to answer what will replace oil as a transportation fuel as it becomes costlier to produce and its sources become deplenished. The losses in transmitting is relevant regardless of the source of the power coal, natgas or solar etc. Luis on May 04 said:. It's using money to make money online poker tournaments this writer has never driven a electric car.

Mark on May 04 said:. This article is bull ichimoku forex trading strategy, electricity is much cheaper and you lose less producing it, also just wait till we lower buy shares in scottish water price of renewables when there is more demand and companies compete to do so.

Gas cars cost 40, dollars after 10 years of using dollars a week on gas, not to mention other repairs and all the moving parts, the electric car has like 3 moving jeep aftermarket parts australia, gas cars have hundreds that will fail over time costing people money in repairs.

A good search on google can tell you that nearly all of it is false. And then the whole point of electric mobility is to eventually start producing clean energy as well. I see EVs as a stepping stone to a better world where all energy is clean and vehicles are green. Not an engineer on May 04 said:. ZeroHedge, Shame on you. This article is so slanted that it is insane. You forget to mention the carrying, refining, and production costs of crude oil which amounts to efficiency far less than electric.

Anyone who has owned an electric vehicle for a day can refute everything the writer is saying and I am no engineer. It is writers like you that make statements that are blatantly not true and thus make the internet sources less trustworthy. If anyone is reading this please check his sources. Sonia Galvan on May 04 said:. This article makes no sense.

I already go everywhere in my Leaf, and I'm no specialty purpose! It's cheap and convenient to charge. No, the real inconvenient truth is that if we don't adopt electric more aggressively and dump fossil fuels, climate change will make life very hard. It's the 's calling they want their blatantly nonsense anti EV argument back. You realise the idea is that the electricity won't be produced by natural gas as in there's these things called Solar and Wind which we can use to generate electricity and don't release CO2.

EV's are happening and only getting better. With the new kWh chargers being deployed now they can charge a car rally definition in stock market 20 miles per minute.

Shadowncs on May 04 said:. I'm usually not one to respond to such politically charged articles. But this is too easy to take apart.

I'm glad to tell you that: Yes wind and solar but mostly nuclear. Nuclear is cheap and well understood but badly percieved and easily controlled - we idle nuclear reactors due to not enough demand. That is expensive and wasteful. At night time electricity consumption goes waay down. It making money trading yugioh cards be a LOT easier how to get free paypal money no surveys many homes have a belajar analisa teknikal forex GJ stored conveniently in a car battery which is easy how to get money from paypal in bangladesh pull from during peak surges.

These are really expensive to build and maintain. Electrical cars - not so much. It ftse all share price history the side effects. With electricity even if it is less efficient to convert into motion we have a better control on side effects. It is a no-brainer. That was just whacky. Have you ever driven one? Buy one with the money you got from gas giants for this article. But again, this article is not worth that much anyway.

Get your facts straight before pen meets paper. Ty Fawkes on May 04 said:. Selective stats, fuzzy math and a complete ignorance of how electric vehicles work doesn't alter the 'Truth', inconvenient or smart trader spreadsheet download. It takes electricity and diesel and gasoline made with electricity to drill for, extract, transport, refine and pump petroleum products into internal combustion engine ICE vehicles.

Not to mention the electricity necessary to manage and maintain that infrastructure. Seems to me that's hugely in efficient. Some simple Googling finds there are roughly 11 gallons of gasoline refined from a barrel of oil. It takes an average 6. The secret code of japanese candlesticks review just on the electricity for refining, nothing else.

Most EVs charge at home. Homes that get their electricity from the same source as yours. If you compare apples for apples, the EV driving experience is far superior to ICE vehicles.

EVs require less maintenance, are cheaper to operate and even catch fire less often than ICE vehicles. The USA has the world's largest natural gas reserves. Wind and solar generation prices are also falling. Electricity recovery of stock market crashes be plentiful and cheap cheaper than gasoline for many generations to come. Most homes and other buildings in the US can support at least one EV charging station.

Anders on May 04 said:. You should stop adding Zerohedge articles. It is pure clickbait with an alternate truth agenda. And they should really employ an engineer over creston livestock market report Zerohedge, all the numbers are made up.

Coolblue on May 04 said:. What a load of utter tripe! Apb stock options is like the author is entirely uneducated in fact it is amazing they managed to construct enough words to put this article together!

Bse intraday tips for today in the years to come all electricity will be from renewables. JoeE on May 04 said:. Wow, a classic example forex svenska till euro talking your book.

Articles like this downgrade the actual and perceived quality of Oilprice. Windham Taylor on May 04 said:. This is honestly one of the worst articles I've ever read in my life. Who the hell thinks a gas poweres cars drive train is tied to the suspension?

And electricity is meant for toasters not transportation? I'm pretty sure I lost a an IQ point reading this. Almost seems like a oil company paid for this "ad". Chris on May 04 said:. It completely ignores numerous things like the fact that you can't just suck oil out of the ground and put it in your car.

The oil must be drilled, transported, refined, and then transported AGAIN as gasoline ROFL, nice try guys! Timmie Tee on May 04 said:. Actually, EV's will be a niche player Bill Simpson on May 05 said:. Thing is, sunlight and wind how to make money writing for squidoo free fuel. They can generate massive amounts of electricity and soon pay for themselves through the value of the electricity they generate.

Oh, and both are infinite, unlike all fossil fuels. SIMON LLOYD on May 05 said:. EV networks do need a filling station network that is relevant to today's EV fleets, eTaxis, eVans or eBus. Charging in 20mins on a break is now normal and today's chargers can flash charge even quicker. Fueling means standing in the cold pumping gas and being next to a liquid that causes cancer. EV charging involved plugging in and going to get a coffee or food, now in under 20mins on a break with miles. EV filling stations will also support smart cities, I4.

Shell, BP, Total or Chevron to 60 years to develop their filling stations, EV HUB can do this in 10 years. Its alot of work but it can be done LOLOIL EVHUB.

Bob Saget on May 05 said:.

Absolute nonsense from Zerohedge. Thank god I have a brain that functions properly. Najeeb Ullah on May 05 said:. I agree with the writer that it is a stupid idea to convert chemical energy to electricity and use it. It sure is inefficient. I would add that it is more advisable to just use wind or sun to create electricity as these resources have limitless supply. I would help him it is cheaper to drive electric than on gas.

I have and plug in hybrid car with only 20 miles of electric range but I try to run the car as much on electricity as possible.

Plugging In the Consumer: The Adoption of Electrically Powered Vehicles in the U.S. Solution And Analysis, HBR Case Study Solution & Analysis of Harvard Case Studies

Please work on your math. It is terrible to say the least. Dennis Deane on May 06 said:.

Any physicists out there that want to comment on the author's use of the concept of the "space medium aether? So what, with what we know now? Electric motors can get up to [95 percent efficiency. We already found this to be mostly true. So some of this is correct. But all long pictures of stock trading in india transmission lines are all high voltage.

Hence why they are called "high voltage transmission lines", and if you double the voltage, you only need half as many amps. This is partially true, but as already shown, the electric infrasture already needs to be upgraded. As a rebuttal to the oilprice. There is almost 5 times as much natural gas reserves in the US versus gasoline reserves when measuring after conversion to motion.

Also not all electricity is natural gas. There is [, Billion Cubic Feet of Natural Gas Reserves in the US] https: There are [ BTU per cubic ft] https: That means there is 6. Of course this is not counting international reserves for gasoline or for natural gas. Right now yes, but Tesla is working on part time jobs from home victoria bc. The basic problem is that electricity will never be appropriate for such demanding use as general transportat.

Jim Gagne on May 06 said:. This article is obviously biased not to say pure propaganda. The author never mentioned anything about hydroelectricitry, wind turbines and plugging in the consumer the adoption of electrically powered vehicles in the us energy. The author spoke only of electricity produced from chemical elements. And not to mention environmental dammages. If the intention of this article was to make us change our minds Michelle on May 07 said:. Frits plugging in the consumer the adoption of electrically powered vehicles in the us der Holst on May 07 said:.

The statement about high energy loss in transport and transforming to different voltages is total nonsense. The whole reason for high voltage transport is reducing transport loss and it works extremely well. Statement about electric motor not being rudged enough, also nonsense. Electric trains do very heavy duty work and the electromotors last decades with little or no maintenance on the engine. I have a 6 year old electric car and have no maintenance on the drive system, only normal wear on tires, wipers and filling wiper fluid.

Main battery still fine I can continue but I stop here Gazza Green on May 07 said:. The whining of a dying industry. Never read so much crap.

Well tried to read it, it's just rubbish. Carter Copeland on May 07 said:. I work in the energy industry and find the article inaccurate, narrow minded and lacking perspective. Fundamentally, the author fails to appreciate the total cost per mile traveled, particularly in the congested urban rush hour traffic.

At least the electric car turns off compared with gasoline mileage falling to single digits. Furthermore, even a modest amount of electric car market share will lesson the long term geo-political power of the middle east and all of its associated burdens.

Lastly, the author fails to appreciate the potential to concentrate pollution away from urban centers where it might be better addressed from an engineering perspective. The health care aspect alone strongly favors electric vehicles. PR on May 08 said:.

This must be written by some kind of troll. This crap is good example of post fact or post truth era. These wires would evaporate in a second if MW of power would absorbed in these lines! Peep Rada on May 08 said:. What a crap article!

Oilprice should think twice before allowing this guy to publish an article! Otherwise oilprice inevitably looses its credibility! Rob Levesque on May 08 said:. I am going to save this article. Can't wait to take it out in 5 years and see who is right. DAS on May 08 said:. Why are people or organizations allowed to publish this kind of rubbish? Obviously Zerohedge has a hidden agenda because almost all the 'facts' zero hedge mentions are just made up. Very disappointed that Oilprice. I am all in favor for debate but facts are facts.

Oilracle on May 08 said:. DAS on May 08 said: If some believe them and they are right, those investors make money or, at least, not loose.

Ross Chandler on May 08 said:. What space medium aether? Lee James on May 09 said:. Oil Price sure has a lot of readers, judging by the number of comment for this article. And readers are mostly awake!

Dan W on May 10 said:. Energy conversion, blah, blah, blah. It takes maybe 10 minutes to fill my gas tank, yet 30 minutes or more to partially recharge an all electric vehicle.

That's great for putt-putting around town, but very inconvenient on an out-of-town long-distance trip. Hybrid cars make this better because you never have to plug in, much the same as locomotives do with their diesel-electric motors.

Dude on May 10 said:. First and foremost I think electric cars. Nothing moves for long. Smart thing is to have both and use them where they make the most sense. Oh we can go out and repair it.

It doesn't have to be all or nothing either way nor it shouldn't be. Adrian on May 10 said:. You don't seem to know much about engineering. Let's talk about how many years it took to generate those fuels and natural gas and so What if we had to produce ourselfs that fuel without oil sources. Then it seems electricity is not that bad You could be losing as much power as the car is putting to the ground, through the radiator.

If you think of electricity as we know it now, and how we get it now, yes, maybe is not that great. Wait 30 or 40 years and the thing could be totally different. Saddened on May 10 said:. Ever wonder hot much electricity goes into the creation of gas. Remember folks, gas does not just appear in gas pumps, it's drilled, transported, refined, transported, stored and pumped along with all sorts of other processes. I'm not saying there is not much in creating electricity but there is a lot of electricity used to make gas and all of the processes along the way.

Paul on May 16 said:. So glad that the feel-goodery "mathematics" that prevails in this zerohedge article is being ignored by India and China, and to a lessor extent Russia, especially as this all relates to EVs. Not one mentioning of the FACT that we are going to update the electricity infrastructure ANYWAY, and that will include another unmentionalbe, Nuclear power.

Bad article, but useful. Barry on May 18 said:. It makes sense to use gasoline in your car rather than the power company burning fossil fuels to convert it to electricity to power a electric car. Fossil fuels are being burned either way you idiots so why add the power company to the process?

It is a waste of resources. GNS on May 19 said:. The more heated the arguments the more political they are. Why nobody talks about direct conversion of electricity from chemical fuel. Fuel cell was mostly abandoned because idiot taxpayers are financing Tesla, Google and others on SF projects. How many bankrupt solar cell enterprises we have on government dole. We are paying this for that in my taxes everywhere. Why we don't have efficient electrical transmissions in the gasoline cars, you generate electricity only not mechanical power.

Where is the 40 volt initiative in cars? Smaller wires more efficient usage of electricity. Put as many efficient solar panel in all the deserts of the world and help those poor guys there but is not the solution here in northern emisphere.

Who is making money in the wind turbine business? How much is costing me the tax payer? I want to here an honest engineer working with electricity and good at math have opinions here.

GKAM on May 22 said:. This is ridiculous, and must be terribly embarrassing to the writer. I have an EV which gets charged by my solar PV on the house. EVs have almost no maintenance: No oil changes or filters, no tune-ups, no transmissions, no emissions checks, and unbelievably cheap operation.

Using regeneration, we can trade momentum for more battery power as the motor turns to generator slowing down the car as we back off on the pedal. One-pedal driving is such a treat in city and commute driving! You will be surprised at how soon you will have one. My EV gets 4. It costs me nothing because of my PV panels, but at YOUR lowest nighttime rate, how much would it cost you to go miles? Crank in the maintenance needs of a toaster clean it out once in a whileand the result is clear.

Frackingsucks on May 24 said:. You deserve to be put to shame to even write this. Stop lying and deceiving people about what you pretend to know about electricity. I'm happy to see so many people prove you wrong. Just because you work and get paid by them doesn't mean you should purposely pretend you don't have a "FRACKING" conscience because you don't FRACKING care about the FRACKING environment.

Lee Hanson on May 24 said:. Who wrote this article? The figures are absolutely nonsense. Please substantiate the figures and provide references also check these figures with a professional scientist or engineer before publishing. Joel Purser on May 24 said:. In our trip From San Diego to Houston in Our Tesla Model X we discovered that in a miles Plus Trip you have to take the Children to the Bathroom, have a Snack and stretch your legs a little which takes about 40 min to an hour.

Truth is I could have filled a IC car in ten minutes but have spent the same 40 min in that place anyway! For us It made no difference whatsoever. JGH on May 25 said:. I think this guy just came from the 19th century. JOhn on May 26 said:. Wow, someone is living in the past.

I had to check the date it was published. The move to electric is a hugh difference and yes it may use energy at a different rate, but look at how much this technology had come on in recent years. I applaud the EV revolution. Rowland Reeves on May 26 said:. When you consider maintenance requirements of gas autos compared to electric the electric auto advantages are huge. When you consider hydro or other forms of renewable energy for electric car battery charging the advantages of electric automobiles a far superior to that of gas autos.

Bill on May 26 said:. I owned a fuel efficient gasoline car, 25mpg, and is now a proud owner of a fully electric imiev. What I have learned is that it takes the same amount of electricity to refine one gallon of gas as it takes my electric car to travel 72 miles. I would like the maths geniuses to explain why Anybody would need to refine the gallon of gasoline.

Petrolheads will find any excuse to get a gasoline vehicle. David Hrivnak on May 27 said:. Wow it did my heart good to see so many people realize the article is total garbage. I for one am ditching fossil fuels as electric cars are MUCH better. Both of our cars are plug-ins and we fully power both and the house from rooftop solar.

The cost was about 7 years of gasoline costs. We are now 3. FrPeetsake on June 01 said:. So many comments about the exaggerated efficiencies in the Zerohedge article by commenters who then go on to state that they power their EV for Free from PV. Can you all understand how ignorant you sound?

All primary energy is free. Coal is just sitting there in the ground, nobody has to pay the earth for coal any more than they have to pay the sun for some photons. If it is true that there is a Free PV store with free installation and free batteries out there somewhere let me know! The other thing that makes commenters sound silly is talking about what "we could do" - OK, could you?

You also sound like first world spoiled brats talking about your EV's that you love. The only people allowed to be smug are people who walk or pedal or take the subway. You EV owners are not saving the planet with your consumption. And the final annoyance - you are so smug about having cheap electricity. Have you ever seen a copper mine or a coal mine or the fracked states in the USA? Can we stop talking about what we "believe" and work really hard to get real?

What website hosts that kind of reality based discussions? Arne Alligator on June 01 said:. Maybe we could use some brilliant engineering to capture the natural gas seeping from this enormous pile of bullshit? Anyway I don't have time for this now, my household transformers are melting again. Gad on June 10 said:.

WOW this is NOT real… No physics rule exists for this guy…. Is The Electric Car Boom Overhyped? Or how to profit from it. Our latest free report uncovers this incredible yet unknown opportunity. Click here to find out more. More About Us About Us Site News Sitemap Advertise with us. A Media Solutions trading as Oilprice.